Moral Pollution In Place of Reasoned Critique
They offered many reasons why the person should not be trusted or liked, but failed to offer reasons why the person was wrong.
A collection of 783 posts
They offered many reasons why the person should not be trusted or liked, but failed to offer reasons why the person was wrong.
A profound discomfort with empirical findings emerging from intelligence research lies at the heart of the disinvitation.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents in a recent study from Vanderbilt University rated their political opponents as “less-evolved” than members of their own party.
The authors have pulled off a modern Sokal hoax. The sequel is rarely as good as the original, but in this case it was more comprehensive and more fun than Sokal’s mockery of postmodernist scholarship.
Young people are told to trust their feelings, that what doesn’t kill them makes them weaker and that the world can be divided into goodies and baddies.
The new humanities maintain that for the last 500 years, Western Civilisation has got it wrong when it comes to knowledge, truth and science.
This was a room full of people passionately engaged in the world of ideas. Yet in their panelist remarks and Q&A comments, few of the speakers and audience members invoked the name of any actual party, politician or even broad political movement.
The response to my posters shows that the phrase ‘female sex’ is on its way to being classified as ‘hate speech.’
The cult of wellness commands: Thou shalt not contaminate the sacred body.
Sinners are threatened not by an angry god, but by a righteous mob.
#MeToo demands that all women must be believed — except where their stories upset the prevailing narrative.