Consent Isn’t Everything and Sex Is Not Like Tea
Some of the enjoyments of sex have to do with a reflective enjoyment of the experience.
Some of the enjoyments of sex have to do with a reflective enjoyment of the experience.
While the culture-war skirmish over transgenderism typically is treated as a debate about culture or sociology, it is also a debate about the primacy of science.
Identity has become the locus of cultural value and representation the means of its transmission.
The school’s decision to suspend, smear and then fire Galloway on the basis of false allegations has snowballed into one of the greatest scandals in the history of Canadian education.
Without an understanding of the selection pressures that shaped our minds, much of human existence is frustratingly bewildering.
Those scientists who want to draw attention to the racial bias in genetic research but who don’t want to acknowledge the scientific validity of race are in a tricky position.
Girls are taught that sex without love is a meaningless experience, boys that, as meaningless experiences go, it’s a pretty damn good one.
They offered many reasons why the person should not be trusted or liked, but failed to offer reasons why the person was wrong.
A profound discomfort with empirical findings emerging from intelligence research lies at the heart of the disinvitation.
Science seeks to explain the world, but explanation conflicts with condemnation, which is an important component of injustice and in turn advocacy.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents in a recent study from Vanderbilt University rated their political opponents as “less-evolved” than members of their own party.
As individuals making personal judgments about the truthfulness of Kavanaugh and Ford, we are not held to the same standards as our justice system.