Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes
Those who ignore politically inconvenient information about affirmative action are more interested in defending a narrative than in actually solving a problem.
A collection of 15 posts
Those who ignore politically inconvenient information about affirmative action are more interested in defending a narrative than in actually solving a problem.
The cure may be worse than the disease.
Civil-rights law made the DEI world; civil-rights reform can unmake it.
The more we try to limit freedom in the interests of desirable social change, the less effective we will be in the long run, and the greater the number of additional problems we create.
In a new memoir, a former academic administrator explains how she led the ideological campaign to enshrine DEI as a ‘core mission’ at the University of California.
Gen X is young enough to take civil rights and integration for granted—but old enough to appreciate how much progress America has made
Was Liz Truss Britain’s first affirmative-action prime minister?
Are racial preferences in university admissions really dead?
In their recruitment efforts, some schools now flat-out exclude white males who don’t self-identify as disabled or LGBT.
“NIH Stands Against Structural Racism in Biomedical Research.” This was the title of a statement released on March 1st, 2021, by Francis S. Collins, who was then the Director of the National Institutes of Health. The statement continued: As a science agency, we know that bringing diverse perspectives, backgrounds, and
A surfeit of reparations advocates (including Ta-Nehisi Coates) are openly disdainful of the diversity rationale—just not so disdainful as to actually oppose diversity initiatives.
The available numbers don’t tell us if there was any evidence of systemic bias in the underlying grant criteria, or in the evaluation of applications against those criteria.
People of goodwill tie themselves into the most absurd intellectual knots as they attempt to discuss affirmative action without acknowledging its inherent unpleasantness.
If the intentions of senior military leadership are not so self-aggrandising and opportunistic, then they are at least ignorant of the underlying dynamics and complexities of gender equality in an environment as unique as the military.
The color question has changed in America and this has implications for the logic of affirmative action.