A Heretic Reprieved
Academic freedom is most vital when contested work is controversial or liable to cause offence.
A collection of 28 posts
Academic freedom is most vital when contested work is controversial or liable to cause offence.
How the battle for the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act was fought, won, and nearly lost again.
It is always the lecturer’s responsibility to ensure that students know that they can speak freely.
A tenured scholar has paid a high price for bluntly expressing uncomfortable truths.
The success of the academy requires academic freedom and tolerance for viewpoint diversity. These critical values are under increasing threat.
And how higher education can reform from within.
To suggest that a spirited discussion of the importance of sex and gender in archeology threatens “scientific integrity” is to misunderstand the nature of science.
Eight decades later, the issues raised by the Russell case—the rights to free speech and academic freedom—have still not been settled.
This 1949 primer shows us there’s nothing new about today’s controversies about free speech on campus.
The investigation into the polarizing law professor violates the most basic tenets of academic freedom.
Academia is a mess, but there is still hope.
If we allow ideological campaigns to discourage controversial research, we will be making a terrible mistake.
Academics who study ancient Paleoindian populations are increasingly being denied access to skeletons, artifacts, and even old x-rays and research reports. We need to start fighting back
Academia has become an intellectual prison, and many incarcerated professors are compelled to live a dual existence.
Next week, I am taking my university to court. To my knowledge, it is the first time an academic institution has been forced, at trial, to justify why it prioritises trans rights over women’s rights. The other party in the case is the University of Bristol, which one might