Against Research Ethics Committees
The guidelines ethics committees follow present themselves as universal rules derived from reason.
A collection of 398 posts
The guidelines ethics committees follow present themselves as universal rules derived from reason.
Workers are instead selected by their educational credentials, even when a degree is unnecessary
In its effort to protect its students from potentially awkward social interactions, the university is arrogating adult decision-making to the institution.
This silencing campaign presents itself as inclusive and therapeutic. In reality, it poses a significant threat to intellectual and academic freedom, yet one that seems perennially overlooked in the campus speech wars.
If I had known, 20 years ago, that my side in the ideological wars over gender and sex was going to win so decisively, I would have been ecstatic
At the height of the #MeToo scandal in 2018, when dozens of actresses were coming forward with sordid testimonies about Harvey Weinstein’s sexual predation, a much more obscure scandal was unfolding around an academic journal involving the anthropologist David Graeber. The journal—HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory—was imploding
Ironically, what is really needed is the restoration of the entire college campus as a safe space for people of all perspectives.
But a further question remains. Where are the men—and, today, women—of real merit that our form of government allows to come to the fore?
Nevertheless, Drayton’s diatribe does reveal something important—not much about me, something about him, but mostly about the vices that fester in certain reaches of our universities, which serve to undermine rational dialogue and public norms of liberal civility.
The rich kids at Gulliver, those who drove Range Rovers and boasted of extravagant vacations, were not black. But at Amherst, many of my new wealthy classmates were.
This is a dimension where knowledge of the world—that same prior knowledge that needs activating—is the last thing that it would occur to anyone to actually teach children in schools.
Toby Young talks to Bruce Gilley, professor of political science at Portland State, about not being able to get his course on conservative political thought approved by his faculty, and his efforts to fight back against progressive authoritarianism on campus. He recently published a piece in Quillette about why he
psychological scientists recognize unwarranted causal inferences when evaluating others’ research but miss it in their own, perhaps because of ideological and self-serving biases.
To a modern research scientist, all of this will seem like common sense, and such principles now are taught even in some undergraduate courses.
Clearly it is possible to do politics in philosophy without doing political philosophy.