The Aziz Ansari Paradox
The Aziz Ansari paradox hurts the feminist movement, and therefore also hurts vulnerable women and girls.
The Aziz Ansari paradox hurts the feminist movement, and therefore also hurts vulnerable women and girls.
This critique by no means denounces meliorism, the belief that the world can be made better by human effort.
Principle of impartiality, universalizability, equality, or whatever, we cannot discriminate against someone merely because he is far away from us.
Dealing with energy sources that are inherently unreliable, and require large amounts of land, comes at a high economic cost.
The movement for trans inclusion now begins in youth sports, where many leagues have no restrictions beyond self-identification.
In rhyming this off, we’re “raising awareness” about the collective action that good citizens can take in the face of a repellant ideology.
Toby Young talks to Bo Winegard, long-standing Quillette contributor and assistant psychology professor, about three of his articles: On the Reality of Race and the Abhorrence of Racism, Centrism: A Moderate Manifesto and The Preachers of the Great Awokening.
We must stand up to those who have no interest in the discipline of Classics or its survival—who even seek its destruction.
Twitter is violating its own stated rules, and it is doing so as a means to target specific individuals for ideological reasons.
A willingness to listen requires us to first recognize that our shared humanity means that we have more in common than that which divides us.
The world of the left generally, and of LGBT identity politics specifically, wasn’t always focused on infinite fragmentation within sects.
Scientific and technological progress cannot happen without people thinking freely—so to clamp down on it is to clamp down on progress itself.
Part of the problem in discussing this is that the meaning of words, as used in some-but-not-all Social Justice-speak, often differs from common usage.
The bottom line is that professional guilds such as the APA and AAP have a demonstrable track record of unreliability when speaking on matters of science.