A Brief History of China's One-Child Policy
In a dizzying volte-face, the world’s most murderously anti-natalist regime has become its most pleadingly pro-natalist.
A collection of 378 posts
In a dizzying volte-face, the world’s most murderously anti-natalist regime has become its most pleadingly pro-natalist.
Why did anyone ever believe Jim Garrison or allow him to ruin the life of an entirely innocent man?
The need for secrecy was therefore paramount. But as he began to plot his sabotage, Clark realized he’d need at least one trusted accomplice.
In 2019, Gilley found himself rebuffed by his own university when he proposed a course on “Conservative Political Thought.”
The Dead are Arising offers similarly interesting insights into Malcolm X’s adolescence and adult life.
Surely we should seek to build on the past where possible, improve upon it, and learn from its successes as much as its failures—to create a healthy and honest partnership between past and present as a foundation for our future.
A great writer shows us how to think rather than telling us what to think.
What does all this have to do with the sexual follies in the White House? Like the Bolshevik Revolution, sex is nothing if not leveling.
In combat, the IDF was more disciplined, which accounts for its battlefield successes—though these probably also owed a lot to the character and quality of the armies they had faced.
A society worth having rests on our willingness to co-operate, to be able to depend a little on the kindness and civility of strangers.
The first step is better wealth distribution. If we are all—as a nation—in it together, then we should all be sharing both the burdens and the benefits.
One general conclusion from reading Leys is that although totalitarian movements are immensely dangerous, that doesn’t mean we should give the theories behind them much intellectual weight.
But the real scandal—not discussed much in the media—wasn’t Krug’s decade of duplicity.
The announced intention of reframing the country’s origin date struck many readers across the political spectrum as an implicit repudiation of the American revolution and its underlying principles.
Ortega viewed the mass man as an interloper in technically advanced, liberal democracies he had played no part in building.