Why It's Time To Stop Worrying About First World 'Gender Gaps'
There will never be perfect 50:50 gender parity in every field.
A collection of 174 posts
There will never be perfect 50:50 gender parity in every field.
From that perspective, it might make sense to co-opt “gender” to refer to human sexual phenotypic diversity.
Women have become angry and defensive as a result of being raised to view men as the enemy.
Sweden was the first state to acknowledge Palestine, antagonising what is the only democratic power in Middle East and steadfast Western ally, Israel.
Nowadays, it’s morally and intellectually permissible to denigrate a group of people based on skin colour and gender, so long as they’re white and male.
If we ask these accusers to explain themselves, are we blaming the victims? Possibly.
There’s a solution, but it’s not one that most feminists want to hear.
We must use these distinctions with care. Labels are most effective when used as a scalpel, not a hammer. Feminologists should not be ridiculed or insulted, but convinced.
Recognizing the existence of differences between men and women should not be considered a regression for the women’s rights movement.
Cossman consistently minimised the scope and power of C-16, using qualifying words and phrases like only, most extreme and high threshold.
For every article published highlighting a case of students being taught this ideology, there are dozens of other instances that aren’t covered by the news.
Oppression does indeed exist. But, oppression is complicated, far more complicated than can be distilled in an undergraduate academic setting.
It might just be that casual prejudice has become so commonplace that many of us don’t even notice it anymore.
Their lives were destroyed, and their lives will remain destroyed if we don’t say anything. To bring back their rights, we must speak up.
It’s about the role of ambivalence in contemporary politics, focusing on an emerging strand of feminist politics.