Skip to content

Politics

Student Scapegoats

The Trump administration’s decision to start revoking the visas of international students is vindictive, petty, and counterproductive.

· 8 min read
A pale young woman in a pale green hijab with glasses smiles as she stands at a microphone.
Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 10 May 2025, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Rümeysa Öztürk with Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and Representative Ayanna Pressley (D MA) and members of her legal team, Carol Rose, Jessie Rossman and Mahsa Khanbabai at Boston Logan Airport, after Ozturk arrived home from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Louisiana. Ozturk was released over six weeks after she was swept up by masked ICE agents on the streets of Somerville, Massachusetts, (Rick Friedman ) Credit: Rick Friedman/Alamy Live News

In March, the Trump administration began revoking the F-1 visas of international students, including some of those who attend the college where I teach history. My students were afraid. They had come to America for an education, and they suddenly felt that they were living on borrowed time. The administration’s policy isn’t merely upsetting to me as a teacher; it is also a betrayal of America’s values and an un-American attack on our free-speech norms.

The government began by targeting a few prominent individuals. On 8 March, Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian graduate student, was arrested at his home by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. He was accused of having served as a spokesman for protests at Columbia University and distributing “pro-Hamas propaganda.” Khalil is a permanent resident of the United States with a green card and his wife, who is currently pregnant, is an American citizen.

A few weeks later, on 25 March, Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student and Fulbright scholar at Tufts University, was seized on the street by plainclothes ICE agents, an event captured in a chilling video recording. The Department of Homeland Security claimed that Öztürk had “engaged in activities in support of Hamas,” but unlike Khalil, she was not an activist. Her only “activity in support of Hamas” seems to have been her co-authorship of an op-ed in the student paper criticising her school’s refusal to condemn Israel.

Two days after Öztürk was seized, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made a statement to reporters justifying her arrest:

If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason you are coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds but because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus, we are not going to give you a visa.

There is no evidence that Öztürk vandalised universities, harassed students, took over buildings, or created any kind of ruckus. Khalil and Öztürk were not the only targets. By early April, thousands of students across the nation received notice that their F-1 student visas had been revoked by ICE. Without visas, they would be forced to return home, their degrees incomplete.

Source: Inside Higher Ed analysisAshley Mowreader/Inside Higher EdAnika Arora Seth • Some institutions have shared publicly that students have lost visas but have yet to disclose the number of students impacted. These are documented on the map, but the number is unknown. A number with an asterisk indicates a positive change in the count, such as a visa reinstatement. Download data.

Students took their cases to the courts. In his defence of the administration’s conduct, Rubio cited the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212(a)(3)(C) of which gives the government the power to deport foreigners whose presence risks “serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.” But many of the arrested students appear to be guilty of only minor infractions, many of which took place years ago. It’s hard to see how an old traffic ticket poses any kind of foreign-policy risk.