Why Feminists Must Understand Evolution
If our common goal is to encourage reciprocal respect for other individuals, in spite of average differences in group proclivities.
A collection of 144 posts
If our common goal is to encourage reciprocal respect for other individuals, in spite of average differences in group proclivities.
At its best, commentary on the science of sex differences has been about method and about evidence, and the knowledge that, with care, these can produce.
What will it take for this contagion to be seen for what it is, so that its most damaging effects can be prevented?
Within the lens of Western culture, it is sex and not money that is the primary root of all evil.
The clearest evidence for this lack of a distinction is the fact that most individuals are cisgender (individuals whose gender identity aligns with their biological sex).
Kipnis’ cautionary tale dovetails with Camille Paglia’s collection of essays, Free Women, Free Men.
From that perspective, it might make sense to co-opt “gender” to refer to human sexual phenotypic diversity.
In fact—it’s even more interesting than that. Multiple matings do (perhaps surprisingly) benefit females in all sorts of ways across all sort of species.
Women have become angry and defensive as a result of being raised to view men as the enemy.
Notwithstanding the ever-expanding reach of Darwinism away from sexuality, the exploration of the evolutionary roots of human sexual behavior is not yet complete.
What happens in a culture where equality rules?
The point is rather that, potentially, even quite marked sex differences in the brain may have little consequence for behaviour.
And unfortunately, that problem is usually one which is socially constructed, rather than scientifically valid.
Somewhere in our evolutionary past how smart and social we are became the major control on our access to sexual partners — not how big or fancy a male’s penis is.