Unpopular Speech and the Shaping of the First Amendment
Schenck and Masses provided opportunities for two judges to set the foundations of First Amendment doctrine for many years to come.
Schenck and Masses provided opportunities for two judges to set the foundations of First Amendment doctrine for many years to come.
Ideological intolerance in academia and the media has dramatically narrowed the range of ‘acceptable’ ideas, beliefs, and even topics of discussion.
“People (mostly liberals) tend to say, ‘You’re on the wrong side of history’ about social issues that are breaking their way.
Marx endures not for his relevance, but because his dense writings offer endless material for academic sermonising.
These modern classical liberals have a diverse array of opinions on a wide array of issues. Summarizing them all would be impossible.
Activists wanted museums to pivot away from historic collections and towards their audiences, focusing more on excluded groups.
Training on ‘unconscious bias’ is the punishment that hiring committees face for not hiring enough female and (non-Asian) minority professors.
We also have our separate ‘facts,’ often the result of what different media outlets consider newsworthy.”
There was a further fork in the road as soixante-huitards debated moving on from baiting police at protests to participating in terrorism.
The effects of colonial contact, and the process of acculturation on small-scale societies, can be quite unpredictable.
Who, after all, would wish for another case like Alfie Evans or Charlie Gard?
One brought down Flight 182, a massacre that remained, until 9/11, the deadliest terrorist attack in the history of aviation.
If activists are embarrassed by constitutional norms, religious devotion, and American virtues, then what are the values around which a progressive movement can hope to organise?