Activism, BLM, Canada, Crime, Spotlight

Exploiting a Woman’s Deadly Fall to Smear Toronto’s Police

A few years ago, when I did ride-alongs with Toronto-area police officers, I saw how much of their job involves dealing with mental-health and addiction issues. Most of the incidents these officers responded to were rooted in troubled households, and the protagonists typically were well-known to the arriving officers: an autistic adult son whose outbursts overwhelmed aging parents, a wife fearful of an alcoholic husband, an agitated elderly man who’d become convinced his neighbours were spying on him through his devices. Most of these incidents required therapists as much as (or more than) police officers. But since the threat of violence hovered over all of them, at least in theory, it was the police who got the call. As I wrote at the time, the officers mostly played the role of social workers with a badge.

The stereotype of police as violent, poorly trained hotheads is sometimes borne out on YouTube, which now functions as a highlight reel for every bad apple wearing a uniform. But the reality—at least in Canada, where I live—is that new officers are typically post-secondary graduates who spend a lot of their time in training sessions. In 2016, I sat in on one such session at a police headquarters facility west of Toronto, where officers attend seminars conducted by experts from within the community, and then go through elaborate small-group role-playing scenarios led by a trained corps of actors who specialize in mimicking various crisis states. As I reported in a magazine article, the facility features a mock-up house with different rooms, so officers can perform their exercises in realistic domestic environments. When each role-playing scenario was completed, the officers were critiqued and interviewed in front of the entire group. Then the actor herself would give her impressions about how the officers’ behaviour made her feel.

I thought about all this following the real-life case of Regis Korchinski-Paquet, the 29-year-old black woman who fell to her death from a Toronto apartment balcony in May while seeking to evade police officers. During one role-playing session I observed four years ago, an actor seeking to evade officers under similar circumstances ran into a bathroom and locked the door. For five minutes, the officers awkwardly tried to coax her out, meeting with eventual success. In the analysis segment that followed, the supervising officer explained that it once was common practice for officers in such situations to simply bash open the door. But this kind of technique fell out of fashion years ago, since it led to unnecessary trauma and risk (for the officers as much as the bathroom occupant).

Some of the other acted exercises I observed included a paranoid schizophrenic crouching under a kitchen table, babbling fearfully as officers tried to soothe him, and a homeless woman who threatened to hurt herself with a knife if officers approached. While holding them at bay from her perch on a living-room sofa, the actress recited a backstory: She had nothing to live for because child services had taken away her kid, her only reason for hope. When she finally put away the knife, the officers walked forward to escort her away—at which point the supervisor ended the exercise and admonished them: “Yes, she put away that knife,” he said. “But how do you know that’s the only weapon she’s got? When you focus on the object, you forget about the person.”

There was also a memorable exercise involving a male actor who was threatening to jump from a window—which presents another grim point of analogy to the Korchinski-Paquet case. It is a mark of this man’s acting skill that, years after I watched his morbid star turn, I still remember the details of his narrative: He was a musician, suffering from depression, who was stuck pursuing a dead-end part-time position with a local orchestra.

Critically, he wasn’t the only actor who was part of this particular exercise. An older woman played the role of his mother, who was screaming non-stop as the officers arrived. Two pairs of officers did the exercise in succession, and their approaches were very different. The first pair—two men who’d recently joined the force—both approached the man and took turns imploring him to step down from the window. But they could barely make themselves heard over the screaming of the actor playing the mother role. Then came the second pair of officers, middle-aged women who’d apparently worked together on the beat. One of the women spoke to the man, while the other officer gently guided the mother off into another room. This was correct practice, the instructor said: You can’t make any progress if you’re just going to become bystanders to an ongoing drama. In many cases, you need to separate the family members before you can help them.

It’s the same principle I saw (and wrote about) when I observed two veteran officers show up at the (very real) home of a young couple who’d been fighting. The man, plainly troubled in all sorts of ways, had punched a hole in the wall, and the woman was frightened. One of the first things that happened upon our arrival was that the female officer—Constable Jaime Peach, who still serves on the Peel Police—took the man downstairs and interviewed him in the lobby. The other officer, Winston Fullinfaw (who was promoted to staff sergeant around the time I rode with him), interviewed the woman and learned about her complicated family situation. Had there been more adults in the household, it’s possible that more officers would have been dispatched: When it comes to complicated domestic disputes, sometimes there is no substitute for manpower. A beleaguered lone officer sometimes may become more prone to violence, since he is more likely to lose control of a situation and feel threatened.

This is something we should think about amid claims that society would be more peaceful if we simply got rid of the police, or starved it of funding. We should also think about how such police forces would respond to funding cuts. Training programs would be one of the first things to face the chopping block. Would that make anyone safer?

On May 27th, the last day of Korchinski-Paquet’s life, a half-dozen Toronto Police Service officers and an EMS worker responded to a call from her family members, who’d told a 911 operator that there was a fight in their 24th-storey apartment. Because Ontario’s independent Special Investigations Unit (SIU) now has released its report on Korchinski-Paquet’s death, based on camera footage and numerous interviews, we know what happened next. As the Toronto Sun accurately reported back in early June, Korchinski-Paquet asked to take a bathroom break before accompanying the officers downtown for mental-health treatment. She then barricaded a door, went onto her balcony, and slipped while trying to step onto another balcony, falling 24 floors to her death. Initial reports from family—which suggested that officers had murdered the woman by deliberately pushing her off the balcony—were completely false.

To state the obvious, the death of Korchinski-Paquet is a tragedy. And it would have compounded the tragedy to learn that her death was a racist act of homicide. One might therefore imagine that it would provide Torontonians with at least some meager solace to learn that their police force had acquitted itself without fault, and in a way that reflected the progressive, non-violent methods that are taught in training programs. But in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd and the riots that followed, it has become a common claim among progressive media and politicians that Canada is every bit as racist as the United States. And in the absence of actual recent Canadian scenes of horror on par with the killing of Floyd, the case of Korchinski-Paquet has been cited as a substitute.

The Toronto Star, which never misses a chance to hustle racism claims to its readers, has run features with titles such as “Regis Korchinski-Paquet’s death and anti-Black violence in policing,” informing us “how systemic racism and anti-Black violence continues to play a huge role in Canada.” In a Star op-ed published in early June, opinion writer Noa Mendelsohn Aviv explicitly rejected the proposition that “in order to comment on Regis’s death, we must wait for the result of the Special Investigation Unit’s investigation because we do not yet have the facts and need to ascertain the truth.” (Even when this week’s report came out, the Star could not bear to abandon its anti-police posture, and so now is impugning the credibility of the SIU.) A Maclean’s writer described Korchinski-Paquet’s death as evidence that “Black lives” are “expendable.” The SIU investigation shows nothing of the kind, even if I doubt we will see any retractions.

Perhaps the most appalling response—because it comes from someone who purports to be seeking the job of Canadian prime minister—was from Jagmeet Singh, leader of Canada’s progressive New Democratic Party (NDP). On August 26th, after the SIU released its report, Singh blithely claimed that Regis Korchinski-Paquet “died because of police intervention. She needed help and her life was taken instead. The SIU’s decision brings no justice to the family and it won’t prevent this from happening again.” Singh offered no theory as to why the SIU report was wrong, but simply delivered a flat-out blood libel against the officers who’d tried to help Korchinski-Paquet on May 27th (and who are likely traumatized by what happened, as any normal person would be). To repeat: This isn’t some college activist or aggrieved family member. It is the leader of a national Canadian political party who holds the balance of power in Canada’s minority Parliament.

Singh is in some ways a special case, because his NDP, having strayed so far from the unionized blue-collar base on which it was founded, now has been reduced to little more than a social-media outpost catering to college hashtaggers. For weeks, in 2017, he spouted conspiracist nonsense about the 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182, the worst terrorist attack in Canadian history. More recently, he casually denounced the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as a gang of bigots, and then was ejected from Parliament when he accused a fellow Parliamentarian of being racist because he didn’t go along with Singh’s slur. But though comprising an extreme example, Singh is hardly alone. Indeed, the presumption that all police are, by their nature, contaminated by racist malignancy, has become a casually recited starting point in debates about crime and policing.

In regard to the actual goal of reforming police methods—which is the thing that Singh and everyone else pretends to care about—it’s worth taking stock of the damage wrought by this irresponsible approach. About three Torontonians die every year during encounters with police, this in a city of three million people. That’s less than one-third the average annual tally for Minneapolis, a city that is one-seventh the size of Toronto. One might think that a 20-plus-fold difference in per-capita police-involved deaths might be seen as statistically significant, and be reasonably attributed to the massive investments in training and professionalism that I have personally witnessed in Canadian constabularies. If best practices in Toronto spread to American cities, lives truly could be saved. But instead, progressives such as Singh are far more interested in polluting Twitter with lazy lies and protest applause lines that erase any distinction between policing methods.

Information about the death of Korchinski-Paquet may be found on the website of Ontario’s SIU. And if there are lessons to be gleaned about how to better respond to potentially violent family crises, our leaders should implement them. But so far, police critics seem far more interested in exploiting this poor woman’s death to advance their own ideological bona fides and defame innocent police officers than with preventing future tragedies.

 

Jonathan Kay is Canadian Editor of Quillette. He tweets at @jonkay.

Correction: The original version of this article erroneously indicated that the average number of Torontonians who die annually in police-involved actions is about one. In fact, it is closer to three. The text has been corrected accordingly. 

Comments

  1. This article shows just how deep the pathology runs in some anti-police circles. Any evidence which contradicts the concept that all disparity must be a product of systemic racism is rejected out of hand. In any Western scenario, where different cultures and different circumstances can produce radically divergent results, in terms of the level of engagement required by police, they are forever doomed to be cast as racist villains in a narrative which bears no resemblance to reality.

    Does racism exist within policing? Yes, of course it does, as it does in all walks of life. But to substitute racism for every type of disparity, even ones which deal with radically divergent rates of homicide by group, does everyone a disservice- because it reduces the urgency of tackling the root causes of crime. But like so many things about the Leftist agenda, the Left doesn’t actually want to do anything about changing the disparities which divide our societies, especially if it means acknowledging unpalatable truths. Their only aim is to campaign, divide, dismantle and overthrow everything that makes our Western societies so safe, secure, successful and special.

  2. Kay is correct, as at this point Singh’s NDP has devolved into a Titianna McGrath-like self-parody of being a collection of imbecilic, useless academics and fossilized public-sector activists spouting far-left trolling excrement nonstop. Singh is also, not surprisingly, an unashamed ambulance chaser who proudly and publicly wears Rolex watches and wears $6000 bespoke suits. The cognitive dissonance between that and his gullible, half-wit followers can be measured in parsecs.

  3. As a retired LEO, I can attest to how fluid and dynamic these situations can be, where it can go from absolute calm to complete mayhem in seconds. It’s unfortunate that Ms Regis Korchinski-Paquet Lost her life, but to assign blame to the officers involved as Mr. Singh and others have done, is exploitation of the worst kind. Unfortunately there are too many who will ignore the SIU report, flawed as it is, as they’ve already made their minds up. Unfortunately no amount of evidence to the contrary will be enough to persuade them that the narrative they believe is simply wrong. Thanks to Mr. Kay for at least trying with his reasonable assessment.

    Update: I have shared the article on a number of Police social media accounts. There is overwhelming appreciation for Mr. Kay’s thoughtful and reasonable article.

  4. Geary, I agree with you when you say that the left does not want the situation to change. If it did change then they would not be able to use that situation to accomplish their political ends whatever that may be. But speaking about the same situations in the US I have to say that most of the problems that the US is having with the police comes form the more left leaning political areas. The riots that these groups are having is not designed to solve a problem nor to find an answer but to gain political power.
    Now if these groups wanted to solve the problem instead of rioting they would be voting. It is politicians that control police conduct either directly by what they do and require that the police do or indirectly by allowing the police to institute their own procedures. So since it is the elected politicians are responsible for overseeing the police when the police are not doing what is correct it is because the politicians have failed to do their jobs. The politicians are employees of the voters (and not the other way around). If an employee is not doing the job that employee is hired for that employee is fired. These areas where the police is failing to meet the standard set for them the politicians are failing to their job thus the voters need to fire that politician and hire an applicant that will do the job.
    So to sum it all up vote not riot. rioting only destroys and hurts the community which it occurs. So if a person out side of the community comes into an area and riots that should be a crime which there should be a legal solution for whether it prison time or paying for the damage done.

  5. Jagmeet-Singh is a liar. The poor girl slipped and fell to her death as the evidence shows.

    Mr. Singh learned to ply his trade from his master, Barak Obama, who still to this day goes around claiming Michael Brown was murdered by the police officer in Ferguson.

    One liar inspiring another, that’s what this identity politics is all about; and the media will propagate the lies.

  6. One would like to think, yes. However, vocabulary follows usage, not the reverse. We can change which words we use, but only at the expense of not being understood, or defining our terms all the time.

    Progressives do not work for progress,
    social justice warriors do not fight for justice (social or otherwise),
    liberals do not want liberty,
    and a Democratic People’s Republic is none of those things.
    “Equality” is treating people unequally,
    anti-racism is hating on white people,
    Black Lives Matter is against institutions that protect black lives,
    “Welfare” is a proven way to make people fare poorly,
    Diversity initiatives make groups think alike,
    Inclusion is about excluding those who don’t.
    “Pro-choice” is about removing all the choices a person will ever make.

  7. Excellent, thanks. I can add that “Woke” means living in a dream world.

  8. @kvom01
    Woke means yoke. Synonyms include bondage, enslavement, servility, servitude, thrall, ect…

  9. Full marks to Mr. Kay for his thoroughness in telling the true story.
    That the assorted activists would use the death of this young woman to further their agenda comes as no surprise but I just can’t help but feel depressed by the behaviour of much of our so-called media and politicians.
    Basic building blocks of public discourse that help support a liberal democracy (in my view at least) such as accurate reporting by the media and the protection of fairness and due process by the political class are disintegrating before our very eyes.
    Of course media outlets or elected officials have always bent their views according the prevailing winds of their default editorial or political positions but we’ve gone way beyond that.
    We’ll invent, and steadfastly hold to, our version of the truth because waiting for events to unfold is time-consuming and may run counter to our position?
    I’ll publicly denounce public servants regardless of the facts or lack thereof?
    It is nothing less than the persistent and willful destruction of Trust.

    It isn’t necessary to hold a PhD in History from a if-you-have-to-ask-you-can’t-afford-it uni to see that peoples and nations that either failed to adopt or protect such basic fundamentals of a cohesive society eventually die a lingering painful death.

    Perhaps there’s an answer, a solution, an anti-dote.
    I just can’t think of one at the moment.

  10. “War is peace.
    Freedom is slavery.
    Ignorance is strength.”

  11. The media is being rewarded for their behavior with clicks, ratings and ad revenue. The politicians are being rewarded for their behavior with election wins.

    They both have something in common: the ordinary citizen.

    Get to him first, and then we can reach the media and the politicians.

  12. Seems this will be Canada’s “hands up, don’t shoot” moment. Grand juries, DOJ Civil Rights Division investigations, all dispelled the myth that “gentle giant Mike Brown” was gunned down by a white cop whilst surrendering with his hands in the air.
    Yet the tiresome mantra is still a fav of BLM.

    I do have to laugh though when the chant “say his/her name” evokes George “Lloyd”.

    Predictably, the mental anguish and physical toll one suffers when marching for such a valiant and worthy cause can be heard in the tired, strained voices, and I have to wonder, who’s Justin and Pete and what did they ever do to them?

  13. At first, it’s surprising that the ordinary citizen, who has greater access to information now than ever before, can be so misguided. Then I think that perhaps I’m simply biased; maybe I’m just seeing a small population of very loud people, who drown out the voices of reason. Maybe most of us have simply shut our mouths because well constructed ideas that are based on good principles and robust reasoning are difficult to hashtag and shout.

  14. Well, it depends. A man was killed by a mob yesterday. The NYT reporter tweeted that:

    NEW: 1 man has been shot and killed in Portland. The man was wearing a hat with insignia for Patriot Prayer, a far-right group.

    So you see, some deaths are justified. He wore a short skirt hat, what did he expect to happen to him at the hand of the lynch mob mostly peaceful protestors?

    But we know who’s fault it all is. Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland declared the violence will stop in his city “when Trump leaved office”.

    Nice country you’ve got there, America, be a shame if mostly peaceful protestors of racial injustice happened to it if you vote the wrong way.

  15. Not long ago I read a book on the history of the CCF, the forerunner of the NDP. I’m far from a socialist but I think Canada needs a rebirth of the CCF in order to argue on the behalf of blue collar workers, farmers, etc. For Singh to make such comments simply shows how out in la la land the NDP have moved.

Continue the discussion in Quillette Circle

10 more replies

Participants