A collection of 125 posts
During his 2015 speech at a Boston mosque, U.S. President Barack Obama said: “And we can’t suggest that Islam itself is at the root of the problem. That betrays our values.”
If Hirsi Ali’s critics are tempted to cite statistics minimizing the threat, they will have to explain at what point – after how many more deaths – they will consider it necessary to take action.
How about the Inquisition? Not a real reflection of Spanish Catholicism in the early modern period, right?
There’s nothing to do but keep on going, or else nothing will change. If we allow these threats, these fears, to shut us down, things won’t change.
Make no mistake, we should be wary of the effects that beliefs might have.
In her new book ‘The Battle for British Islam,’ campaigner Sara Khan offers a work of admirable frankness, determination, and moral clarity.
By no means does freedom of religion, however, confer on religion or religious customs exemptions from criticism, satire, or even derision.
With the ongoing migrant crisis emanating from the Muslim world and as an asylum seeker himself.
The doctrine of inerrancy, on the other hand, places intolerable constraints on polite conversation, our only known alternative to violence.
The words are usually associated with Eastern or New Age spirituality, and they sound as bizarre on the tongue of a science-minded atheist as an Arab Bible-believer.
A woman whose life story, by any rational, humane standards, should win encomia from, and the admiration of, decent people everywhere.
As it turns out, the phenomenon of a young man becoming radicalized after reading his religion’s holy book for the first time has been around for thousands of years.
Aslan peddles a sanitized version of Islam to gullible viewers.
The misguided progressives who denounce “Islamophobia” and turn a blind eye to the mistreatment of, say, women, gays, and adherents of other religions in Muslim communities or in Islamic countries constitute what Maajid Nawaz has dubbed the “regressive left.”