Philosophers Smear One of Their Own for Gender Heresy
Why do philosophers so often uncritically support the conventional views of the time and place in which they find themselves?
A collection of 236 posts
Why do philosophers so often uncritically support the conventional views of the time and place in which they find themselves?
Expowering is a transitional measure since you cannot fire your way to equity.
Many nominally democratic political regimes practice de facto censorship in regard to material criticizing their populist rulers.
Though the population is largely white, Squamish has steadily become more diverse in recent years, and now boasts a thriving Sikh community.
The universities are also where rigorous research, science, and valuable knowledge production continues to happen, and it is the universities we will need to push back at this and self-correct.
I also needed to say that they had it all wrong, that the white privilege they were arguing about was actually opportunity and nothing else.
Reasonable debate and discussion then becomes impossible as activists make unfalsifiable but furiously emotive claims about alleged threats to their safety and wellbeing amid much weeping and claims of exhaustion and mental fragility.
Tech companies are not equipped to rule on messy and complex disputes over truth.
Not so long ago, one might have been able to count on the naturally oppositional reflexes of young adults as a counterbalance to this kind of crowdsourced social panic.
What’s worse, anyone who points out the nonsensical and performative aspects of these presidential letters will be gaslit for his troubles—this, in a supposed citadel of logic and learning.
In the case of the media, we’ve had a running social experiment underway since 2015 that helps us answer this question.
In 2019, Gilley found himself rebuffed by his own university when he proposed a course on “Conservative Political Thought.”
Two components make up an availability cascade: an informational cascade and a reputational cascade.