Politics
A Single Spark
In the age of the Internet, can the Sitong Bridge Warrior’s protest make a difference?
For Beijingers whose morning commute takes them under the Sitong overpass on the hectic north section of the city’s Third Ring Road, October 13th, 2022, will live long in the memory. That was the day that plumes of smoke from a bridge fire drew their attention to two large crimson-daubed banners. One read: “Food, not nucleic acid tests. Freedom, not lockdown. Dignity, not lies. Reform, not Cultural Revolution. Votes, not leaders. Be citizens, not slaves.” The other was an exhortation: “Students and workers, strike and depose the dictatorial traitor [literally: “country thief”] Xi Jinping! Arise, ye who refuse to be slaves! Oppose dictatorship! Save China! One person one vote to elect the Chairman!” The man responsible for both banners and fire stood alone on the bridge, decked out in the garb of a construction worker. As if his actions had left any room for ambiguity, he blasted a pre-recorded message through a loudspeaker, instructing astonished citizens to “Strike and depose the dictatorial traitor Xi Jinping!”
What we know about the #BridgeMan https://t.co/SUzdk0eSFm
— Georg Fahrion (@schorselysees) October 15, 2022
The lighting of a fire was fitting: all that thick smoke belching out over the freeway, burning his message on the Beijing sky. The urgency and alarm of the image matched what he had done—he had taken the private anger felt by so many Chinese and manifested it; made it physically real and shockingly public. Words he had recorded days before in the privacy of his home were now echoing around downtown Beijing; characters he had scrawled in secret were now captured by cameras and seen all over the world. In a totalitarian state, these are unthinkable, blasphemous actions.
Those who criticise Xi Jinping meet with the worst of punishments. Past activists calling for Xi to step down have died within weeks of being sent to prison. One dissident who splashed ink on a poster of the President was sent to a psychiatric hospital, and the staff were given instructions to poison her to death. Even CCP leaders are given no quarter. Party chief Wang Min made the fatal error of quietly grumbling to his chauffeur when Xi passed him over for promotion. The chauffeur reported his comments, and Wang was sentenced to life in prison (his crime was “resistance to Xi’s leadership”).
Chinese activist Wang Mei was arrested and sent to a detention center in July after he held up a sign calling on Xi Jinping to step down and allow universal suffrage in China. His wife received news today that he has died. No explanation of how or when. https://t.co/NAi9n6nzb5
— Lily Kuo (@lilkuo) September 23, 2019
The bridge protester has gone further than any of these, broadcasting his anti-Xi message to countless commuters, and ultimately around the world. Few people have ever heard of Wang Mei (the activist killed in prison), or Dong Yaoqiong (the woman sent to a psychiatric hospital). Many have now heard of the “Sitong Bridge Warrior,” also referred to as “Bridge Man”—an echo of 1989’s iconic Tank Man—even if they don’t know his name. (It is Peng Lifa.) This notoriety has alarming implications for Peng’s treatment in police custody. Worse, the incident has caused the authorities great embarrassment, occurring as it did during a period of heightened security in the capital prior to the 20th Party Congress. Peng’s remaining days are unlikely to be happy ones.
Footage of the protest shows crowds of people staring up at the overpass, and stopping their motorcycles to record the scene. For many citizens, this must feel like a brief lifting of the veil—a shocking denial of everything they are told is true. Some will feel a surge of excitement as their secret grievances are given voice; others will feel indignation at such blasphemy. But for most, the Sitong Bridge Protest will be like waking from a long slumber. It will feel both thrilling and terrifying: the intrusion of bright reality on their decades-long stupor; the unearthing of all they have repressed and refused to acknowledge. The question now is whether they will sink straight back into sleep again.
Once every few years, the Chinese public is jolted awake by an incident like this. In March 2002, a group of Falun Gong practitioners successfully hijacked Changchun city’s television signals for 50 minutes. They scrambled up telephone poles in the middle of the night, opening hubs and splicing wires. This enabled them to broadcast an exposé of the Party’s lies and propaganda to more than a million citizens. Believing that then-President Jiang Zemin must have been overthrown, people began spilling into the streets and celebrating. But the hijackers were hunted down. All died in custody: some were beaten to death within hours of arrest; some were tortured with electric batons until their hearts stopped; some managing to last a couple of years in prison before succumbing to spinal injuries. And so the people of Changchun suppressed the memory of that strange evening and slipped back into the long Chinese coma.
Could the Sitong Bridge Warrior be more successful? He was detained as protesters are always detained, but we are beginning to see his impact. Over the past fortnight, similar banners have adorned bridges from Los Angeles to Westminster, echoing Peng’s slogans and sometimes adding new ones: “No to Mandarin, yes to our mother tongue.” Anti-Xi posters and placards have cropped up in some 250 universities around the world. Significantly, these are written in Chinese, by mainlanders studying abroad.