Irrational AI-nxiety
Concerns over the potential harm of new technologies are often sensible, but they should be grounded in fact, not flights of fearful fancy.
A collection of 371 posts
Concerns over the potential harm of new technologies are often sensible, but they should be grounded in fact, not flights of fearful fancy.
The case for deferring to scientific consensus on politically contentious topics is much weaker. This is true because what scientists publicly say may differ from what they privately believe.
To figure out what’s really going on, it’s worth taking a broader look at today’s teens – a generation of kids I call “iGen” – and the environment they’re living in.
Damore stresses that these are differences at a statistical level between large populations and that we should not assume that they are descriptive of any particular individual.
Within the lens of Western culture, it is sex and not money that is the primary root of all evil.
This robustness does still exist, but only at a fairly low level, where raw packets of data are routed between numerical addresses.
One consequence of these genetic battles is the effect on reproductive compatibility within a species.
There is no room for nuance, no room for subtlety. Feelings supersede facts. The emotions of the most fragile must be soothed at any cost, even if the truth is a casualty.
Many warnings were offered up to us about how well-meaning scientists and policy makers could slip into using genetic information maleficently.
Psychedelics are incredible tools whose significance lies in their ability to catalyze the power of the human mind for healing, creativity, and spiritual consciousness.
This may come as a surprise to those who developed their opinion about it, not by reading the memo itself but by absorbing accounts of it in the popular press.
The message is loud and clear: sugar is bad, government regulation is good, and now we have the science to prove it.
What Google needs to do is to tailor its diversity policies towards the men and women who work at Google.
The message that liberates women is not: men and women are the same, and anyone who tells you different is oppressing you.
Psychological differences make equal outcomes impossible. Equality or diversity. You can’t have both.