A collection of 1202 posts
Ideological intolerance in academia and the media has dramatically narrowed the range of ‘acceptable’ ideas, beliefs, and even topics of discussion.
“People (mostly liberals) tend to say, ‘You’re on the wrong side of history’ about social issues that are breaking their way.
These modern classical liberals have a diverse array of opinions on a wide array of issues. Summarizing them all would be impossible.
Activists wanted museums to pivot away from historic collections and towards their audiences, focusing more on excluded groups.
There was a further fork in the road as soixante-huitards debated moving on from baiting police at protests to participating in terrorism.
The effects of colonial contact, and the process of acculturation on small-scale societies, can be quite unpredictable.
Who, after all, would wish for another case like Alfie Evans or Charlie Gard?
If activists are embarrassed by constitutional norms, religious devotion, and American virtues, then what are the values around which a progressive movement can hope to organise?
By refighting the Canon Wars, there is hope that we can chart a more productive course than the one we have inherited.
A Cognitive Theory of Politics can improve our understanding of contemporary political movements, such as the protests happening on college campuses.
Is it possible that innovation is not only stalling in non-tech areas, but in tech itself? Could we make an argument to say that the internet itself is, in fact, complete?
Are we required to treat this as a legitimate view deserving of an audience and a debate? Or are we allowed to conclude that Kevin Williamson is a callous fanatic?