A collection of 19 posts
Kendi's view of racism does not begin with people, but with inequity. Which means anti-racism should more truthfully be called anti-racial inequity.
Why might a social psychological concept gain such broad traction despite being poorly defined and weakly researched? Perhaps because it is true.
The suggestion that a viewpoint comes from a “racialized frame of reference” is, in fact, an expression of doubt about my ability to be objective.
The lack of any ideological counterpoise has created a vacuum where ideas have no mechanism or incentive for moderation.